|
Author |
Message |
roadking |
Post subject: Re: FXDWG MPG Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 12:07 pm |
|
|
Senior Road Captain |
|
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 10:11 am Posts: 3633 Location: Orange County, CA |
|
|
Kickstand wrote: I have never noticed it turning white before like wax, but I can test that question on my WG and get back with you. I can remember a funny moment when polishing the chrome on my Heritage in the first year I had it. I was in the garage laying on the floor with a flashlight looking at the chrome on the primary cover (it looks wierd up close... or at least it did that night) anyway... my ex-wife walked into the garage to tell me something and just stopped in her tracks, looked at me, and said, "you got to be f'ing kidding me".... and then walked back out. My latest GF has called me obsessed about my bike on a regular basis, so, KS you're in good company. I was working on my bike this summer with the new tires and the carb rebuild. It was the hottest time of the year so I did what I could at night when it was cooler. Here i am with a small flashlight in my teeth working away getting the bolts out for the intake manifold- its a slow and tedious job because of the wrench clearance. She comes out and sees me working and I got the same reaction - OMG you should see yourself, I was laughing too hard to hear the rest of what she was saying... I'm her first motorcyclist I told her to get used to it. - NOW- she's all "Can I go? - Can I go?" - I think I created a monster... she sat on some bikes at the dealership. Then I took her too look at Scooters - Honda PCX 150 - I told her she should start out small
You can have it cheap. You can have it fast. You can have high quality. PICK ANY 2....
|
|
Top |
|
|
roadking |
Post subject: Re: FXDWG MPG Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 12:23 pm |
|
|
Senior Road Captain |
|
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 10:11 am Posts: 3633 Location: Orange County, CA |
|
|
Kickstand wrote: I might take carb apart if it doens't get much better after I hit it with some carb cleaner a few more times. Since the bike is a 2005 and it only had 13k on it when I got it, there is a good chance it is just gummed up. roadking wrote: 33.3 is 6 mpg improvement and once you use that stuff it keeps cleaning for a tank so it might even get better. Probably couldn't hurt to hit it again in month. Good for you. I think you may have been the person to suggest the carb cleaning... thanks. It was one of you guys. Thanks guys. I hope it can be cleaned with just treating the fuel. If I have to I will pull it apart. Credit goes to Lenny, he's on top of things. I just second a good idea when i get the chance. At 33 mpg you're in the ball park for average mpg's. And hitting it again is a good idea. If you do have to pull the carb off I did a thread on it - PM me if you have any ??'s
You can have it cheap. You can have it fast. You can have high quality. PICK ANY 2....
|
|
Top |
|
|
Kickstand |
Post subject: Re: FXDWG MPG Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 4:16 am |
|
|
Rider |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 11:01 pm Posts: 558 |
|
|
Thanks Lenny!!! I put another triple dose of B12 yesterday. This time I let it did not empty the carb overnight. I'll let it set in the carb while it is off during this treatment.
“In the high country of the mind one has to become adjusted to the thinner air of uncertainty...” ― Robert M. Pirsig
|
|
Top |
|
|
roadking |
Post subject: Re: FXDWG MPG Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:02 pm |
|
|
Senior Road Captain |
|
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 10:11 am Posts: 3633 Location: Orange County, CA |
|
|
KS, I was wondering, does the bike run differently now that you're getting better gas mileage?
You can have it cheap. You can have it fast. You can have high quality. PICK ANY 2....
|
|
Top |
|
|
Kickstand |
Post subject: Re: FXDWG MPG Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 3:56 am |
|
|
Rider |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 11:01 pm Posts: 558 |
|
|
roadking wrote: KS, I was wondering, does the bike run differently now that you're getting better gas mileage? Possibly... it's hard to tell. It was running great (at least to me) before. I think the MPG it getting close to 35ish. I have been riding hard to and from work (75-85). I need to take a 200 mile road trip where I drive the speed limit with normal riding.... it may hit 38 then. I will test it when I am off.
“In the high country of the mind one has to become adjusted to the thinner air of uncertainty...” ― Robert M. Pirsig
|
|
Top |
|
|
badinfluence63 |
Post subject: Re: FXDWG MPG Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 9:33 am |
|
|
Road Captian |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 9:51 am Posts: 1966 |
|
|
That still seems low. I get in the 40's with my bagger.
The only time I got low mpg's is when I cammed my 2001 w/ the SE 204 cam. It stayed in the mid 30's but boy did she have some get up and go. From a dead stop and passing especially.
To expect to be perfect is unreasonable, to strive for perfection is reasonable. 2015 Ultra Classic Low.
|
|
Top |
|
|
roadking |
Post subject: Re: FXDWG MPG Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:08 pm |
|
|
Senior Road Captain |
|
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 10:11 am Posts: 3633 Location: Orange County, CA |
|
|
Kickstand wrote: Possibly... it's hard to tell. It was running great (at least to me) before. I think the MPG it getting close to 35ish. I have been riding hard to and from work (75-85). I need to take a 200 mile road trip where I drive the speed limit with normal riding.... it may hit 38 then. I will test it when I am off. I get a drop in mileage over 75, low/mid 30's... so you're not too far off anymore. Last tank - running 80+ 2up - (before you guys start thinking I'm careless - that's just traveling traffic speed on the roads we were on and going slower only makes you a road hazard), I got 33.4 mpg. One heck of a head wind on the way home didn't help either.
You can have it cheap. You can have it fast. You can have high quality. PICK ANY 2....
|
|
Top |
|
|
Kickstand |
Post subject: Re: FXDWG MPG Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:41 am |
|
|
Rider |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 11:01 pm Posts: 558 |
|
|
badinfluence63 wrote: That still seems low. I get in the 40's with my bagger.
The only time I got low mpg's is when I cammed my 2001 w/ the SE 204 cam. It stayed in the mid 30's but boy did she have some get up and go. From a dead stop and passing especially. Your bagger is well tuned machine of which only your buttocks have graced it. There is no telling who did what, when, where, on mine It's looking like the fuel system was gooped up. I think the best case for MPG on my WG is 42... that is just by memory. roadking wrote: I get a drop in mileage over 75, low/mid 30's... so you're not too far off anymore. Last tank - running 80+ 2up - (before you guys start thinking I'm careless - that's just traveling traffic speed on the roads we were on and going slower only makes you a road hazard), I got 33.4 mpg. One heck of a head wind on the way home didn't help either. In traffic here you have to travel 70 to 85 as well. I try to move a little faster than traffic... at least it seems safer to me. I need to test the MPG at a slower pace. It may be on par now.
“In the high country of the mind one has to become adjusted to the thinner air of uncertainty...” ― Robert M. Pirsig
|
|
Top |
|
|
badinfluence63 |
Post subject: Re: FXDWG MPG Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:07 pm |
|
|
Road Captian |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 9:51 am Posts: 1966 |
|
|
Kickstand wrote: badinfluence63 wrote: That still seems low. I get in the 40's with my bagger.
The only time I got low mpg's is when I cammed my 2001 w/ the SE 204 cam. It stayed in the mid 30's but boy did she have some get up and go. From a dead stop and passing especially. Your bagger is well tuned machine of which only your buttocks have graced it. There is no telling who did what, when, where, on mine It's looking like the fuel system was gooped up. I think the best case for MPG on my WG is 42... that is just by memory. roadking wrote: I get a drop in mileage over 75, low/mid 30's... so you're not too far off anymore. Last tank - running 80+ 2up - (before you guys start thinking I'm careless - that's just traveling traffic speed on the roads we were on and going slower only makes you a road hazard), I got 33.4 mpg. One heck of a head wind on the way home didn't help either. In traffic here you have to travel 70 to 85 as well. I try to move a little faster than traffic... at least it seems safer to me. I need to test the MPG at a slower pace. It may be on par now. They should be able to hook your bike to their computer and see if its had what stage download or a cam? I cannot imagine a Wideglide only getting 35MPG.
To expect to be perfect is unreasonable, to strive for perfection is reasonable. 2015 Ultra Classic Low.
|
|
Top |
|
|
roadking |
Post subject: Re: FXDWG MPG Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 2:56 pm |
|
|
Senior Road Captain |
|
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 10:11 am Posts: 3633 Location: Orange County, CA |
|
|
Kickstand wrote: In traffic here you have to travel 70 to 85 as well. I try to move a little faster than traffic... at least it seems safer to me. I need to test the MPG at a slower pace. It may be on par now. Moving a couple miles an hour faster than traffic is what I was taught also as part of the safety course.
You can have it cheap. You can have it fast. You can have high quality. PICK ANY 2....
|
|
Top |
|
|
|
|