harley wrote:
don't make the mistake of buying a sportster
Yikes, that cannot be more of a misleading statement.
I can assure you that the modern iteration of the Sportster ain't your daddy's bike. They are not the poor handling, magneto saddled, hard starting, knee disjointing dinosaur we keep assuming they are.
As for handling, I dare anyone to keep up with me in the curves. Many of the innovations started life in a Buell.
You might have to change a few things on the 1200 Custom to get it to tour, but then we change out things on a dresser and never give it a stray thought. Not everyone is a barrel chested saloon brawler. And our most highway savvy long distance tourer in the fourm, BadInfluence63, also benefits from a lower stance.
Of all the bikes I've owned--and that includes some metrics--my Sportster 48 is in the
top three bikes I have ever owned over
four decades. The issue is our foolish never-ending idea that bigger is always better. A full dress Electra-Glide-ish bike would be an albatross around my neck. Not counting the ridiculous sum of money I'd have to pay to obtain an ego bicycle, I'd have to feed it premium gasoline, suffer increased insurance rates, and store the thing when it wasn't running.
For what? My life is not yours. And let's not forget I know several guys whose
mileage dropped when they traded in smaller bikes for dressers.
Evaluate your individual needs and experience, factor in feeding the motorcycle, and honestly settle your wants and ego. Buy that bike. Don't let guy on an unneeded parade float argue you into a bike that will sit under a dusty cover and rot.